Wednesday, December 19, 2012

The Amazing Spider-Man (a look by Michael Samuel)


Today I’m looking at the first 4 Volumes of Marvel Masterworks: The Amazing Spider Man, Collecting Amazing Fantasy #15, The Amazing Spider-Man #1-40, and The Amazing Spider-Man Annual #1-2.

Upon first reading these stories, I was less than impressed. I couldn’t get past the art. My first Spider-Man comics were from the John Romita Era, so I kept holding the comics to those standards.

Ah yes. Fond memories...

Eventually I was able to read the stories without bias. I saw Ditko's work for what it was: simple, effective art. Without further ado, onto the plot!


Peter Parker is a Nerdy Teenager at Midtown High in Forest Hills, New York. One Day he goes to a Science exhibit with experiments in radiation and is bitten by a spider that was accidentally hit with radiation. Instead of giving him cancer, this spider bite gives him superpowers. He then does what any sensible person does: Try to make money off of this. First he wrestles Crusher Hogan for $100. Then he lands a gig showing off on the Ed Sullivan Show. At this point, Peter is clearly in this for the fame and fortune. But when a security guard is chases a burglar, Spiderman valiantly… does nothing.


In a twist of Irony (That we all probably have engraved in our brains) the same guy that robbed the studio later burgles the Parker residence and kills Peter’s Uncle Ben. It is then Peter learns that with great power there must also come great responsibility (unless you are selling your marriage to the devil apparently, but that’s a different, more stupid story).

I could have put 1 of 1000 jokes here, but I couldn't choose.
I just keep asking myself why this story even exists.

Beyond that, The Amazing Spider-Man had several developing stories, despite each issue being a stand-alone story. Continuity plays greatly into many stories without getting confusing. Some plot elements or details for some of these arcs are laid issues in advance such as Aunt May’s blood transfusion or Norman Osborn’s cameo 14 issues before his formal introduction. One major story arc that lasted artist Steve Ditko’s entire run (the resolution of that arc was covered in the first two stories drawn by John Romita) was the mystery pertaining to the identity of the Green Goblin. It is a story arc that lasts from issue 14 all the way to issue 40. Another famous story arc was the Master Planner story, where Spider-Man had to race against the clock to save his aunt from dying of radiation poisoning (That she got from a blood transfusion).

If you haven’t guessed by now, our hero is Peter Parker (who is secretly the Amazing Spider-Man). Other supporting cast include His Aunt May (Who is elderly) and his Uncle Ben (Who is dead). We also have Peter’s peers, Flash Thompson, Liz Allen, and later Harry Osborn and Gwen Stacey. Mary Jane Watson (a girl Aunt May tries to hook Peter up with) is also present with her face always obscured. At The Daily Bugle we have J. Jonah Jameson, Betty Brant, and Frederick Foswell. Many of these characters have their own arcs and side stories. They are fleshed out, having their own goals and ambitions. And that’s not even counting the villains.



Many of Spider-Man’s greatest villains were created in this first era, when Ditko or Romita were behind the Artwork. In the first 4 Marvel Masterworks collection we were introduced to many Iconic villains: The Chameleon, The Vulture, Doctor Octopus, The Sandman, The Lizard, Electro, Mysterio, The Green Goblin, Kraven the Hunter, and The Scorpion. Even Doctor Doom (Nemesis of the Fantastic 4) faces off against Spider-Man.


Other great villains include The Big Man, The Enforcers, The Spider Slayers, the Molten Man, and Professor Stromm. While these baddies aren’t as famous, they have become reoccurring villains or have impacted the Spider-Man Mythos in a great way. The Big Man (renamed Mr. Big) had an important (mostly posthumous) role in Ultimate Spider-Man. Dr. Stromm even got a role in the first spider man movie.


Then there are villains such as the Living Brain, the Meteor, The Cat and Just a Guy named Joe. These antagonists are probably best left forgotten.


Lies. That's a robot, its not alive. And its not a brain.

Themes for the Amazing Spider-Man are pretty straightforward. Teenage hardships are a common occurrence in these early stories as well as the pressures of life in general. Peter has an Aunt he needs to care for, High School and later College life to deal with, Romantic tension, Working for the Daily Bugle, etc. Despite later writers seem to think, writing Spiderman isn’t simply writing these pressures as the world being out to get him and many miss the fact that Peter Parker is a very determined as a character. He gets buried under a pile of Lab Equipment; he struggles to free himself, persevering after 5 tense pages. That is an element Missing from many modern Spider-Man stories (I’m looking at you, One More Day)


Why yes, I am still beating this dead horse.
Never really had a chance to vent about this 'till now.


Stan Lee, Steve Ditko, and Jack Kirby were the creators of Spider-Man, with Stan and Steve being the first writer and artist for the comic, respectively. Today Stan Lee is a personality in and of himself. He cameos in every Marvel Movie. Other creations attributed to him include the Fantastic Four, The Hulk, The X-Men and Daredevil, though he is hardly the sole creator of these works. On the other hand, Steve Ditko is less known to pop culture. He was the creator and artist for Doctor Strange. After leaving Marvel, Ditko went on to make the Question and the 2nd Blue Beetle for Charlton Comics, two characters who later became heroes in the DC Universe and were the inspiration for Rorschach and Nite Owl from Alan Moore’s Watchmen.


Text and Art blend well rather than one becoming dominant over the other. The text narration can get annoying at times, but it never feels as if there is too much text just for the sake of text. As for the art, it is simple yet highly emotive. While one might hesitate to call the art outright cartoonish, Steve Ditko’s art certainly strays closer to the cartoonish than later Spider-Man artists. Like I said above, I wasn’t a fan of his art at first. Compared to Romita’s artwork, I felt as if Ditko’s art was amateur in comparison. It didn’t match the realism of Romita’s work. But I learned to appreciate Ditko’s style as it captures the tone of these early issues.

While on the subject of Ditko, a distinctive Ditko element works well in these stories. I personally am ambivalent to the philosophies of Objectivism. While some aspects are a bit too conservative, the Idea of a man being able to persist in the face of adversity is relatable to anyone. While I’m unsure if it is an Objectivist thought, it is used often in these stories, Notably Doctor Octopus’ first appearance and the Master Planer story arc.


On the down side, these stories haven’t aged that well. Little things, like communist spies, the slang used by the characters, and references to 60’s pop culture (such as Ed Sullivan and Soupy Sales) date the comic severely. However the core stories themselves are strong enough that with a little retooling they can be enjoyed by modern readers.

The Old 1960s Version

The New 2000s Version

For that, I recommend Marvel Age Spider-Man for younger Spider-Man fans and people who want to read the classics told in a modern setting. Personally though, I prefer the older stuff.


The Amazing Spider-Man had a profound impact on not only comics history, but pop culture as a whole. If Stan’s story on Spider-Man’s creation is even half true, then Spiderman was one of the first superheroes to deal with problems relatable to the reader. Today, Spider-Man is an icon.

2 comments:

  1. The Ditko Spider-Man is unique in that he's not good-looking, he's not well-built or athletic. He's a "scrawny teenager"-and he's pretty much drawn that way by Ditko all the way through his run. Romita's Peter Parker is a hero right out of a Romance comic, as are his women. Pretty much everyone Romita draws is attractive(particularly the women: Gwen and Mary Jane)-which makes him an odd choice for Spider-Man after Lee had rejected Kirby's heroic take on the character early on. But Romita does bring a distinctly darker atmosphere to the book through his rich line-work and chiaroscuro. By the way-correct me if I'm worng- the death of Gwen Stacey is penciled by Gil Kane and inked by John Romita. Lee's innovations were ground-breaking in the early '60's--his super-heroes were people and personalities the reader could care for, rather than the one-dimensional heroes readers were used to(Superman, Batman). Today it's easy to take Lee's innovations for granted, but the simplicity, innocence and humor underlying his approach is something that writer's today would still do well to emulate.

    ReplyDelete